Accidentally in Code

Do Twitter Scammers Have Conversations?

Posted on: October 10, 2009

I’d like to say a big thankyou to @CoureyGetsMoney for following me (3,109 Following 2,831 Followers). His bio reads:

Thanks for checking out my page im a real cool guy making 12,000 a month working from home with GDI

I suspect he’s lying about his income and about being a “real cool guy”. I also suspect he’s using auto-follow and is just trying to drive traffic to his scam. Lets check out his graph…

@coureygetsmoney's Twitter Conversation Graph

He’s not part of the conversation. Just a scammer. Spammer. Whatever. What does your graph say about you?

Advertisements

4 Responses to "Do Twitter Scammers Have Conversations?"

I love your work – it’s a really cool visualisation that I think will have lots of great uses. Thanks for doing my graph. Is it at all possible to get a better quality image at the end of the process – I ask because I’d like to use a couple of your graphs (including my own) in a presentation and it would be useful to be able to see some of the names. I guess that is also going to be important if people are going to use it in the way that you suggest.

Thanks again.

Sure – send me an email to (on about page, nothing in between) [at] gmail.com and tell me which ones you want. Let me know if you put your slides up!

[…] that follow you in order to get you to follow back and click on their links (I talked about them in this post) and then there are the kind that send you unwanted @ […]

[…] Do Twitter Scammers Have Conversations? […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Archives

Tweet Tweet

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

%d bloggers like this: